It used to be illegal in the state of Georgia to get and utilize fireworks, but recently, the state has changed their view on it, and they’ve decided to take a different approach on the whole matter. Their new laws basically state that anyone within the state, as long as they are over the age of 18 and have an idea with which to prove their age, is able to purchase and utilize fireworks within the state.
There are a number of stipulations that have come with the law. First, as mentioned by an orange county car accident lawyer, they have to be over 18. If the people who buy the fireworks are planning to set them off themselves, then they have to pay an extra 5 percent in tax in order to be able to do so, in case something happens. According to Attorney Scott DeSalvo there are also restrictions as to where the fireworks can be set off. Nuclear power plants and gas stations are off limits, and you have to be more than 100 yards away from such places in order to set off the fireworks safely and within the law. That’s more about safety than anything else.
This means good news for Georgia all around. People are going to be able to buy fireworks within the state, which means that they won’t have to worry about going to other states in order to get what they need. That means that the revenue is going to stay within the state, which makes it a lot better for the state’s economy as well – just make sure you have a good car accident lawyer. People were going to other states, like Alabama and Florida, to get their fireworks, so it’s best that they just state in the state as it is anyhow. They’re now one of dozens of states all over the country that allows fireworks to be enjoyed and purchased by just anyone who is legally able to.
So, what do you think? What are the stipulations that may occur with the legalization of fireworks in Georgia? Are private fireworks legal in your home state, and how are the laws applied for them? Let us know what you think in the comments.
While child safety has always been a thing, Pennsylvania has taken it a step further and made a statewide requirement that, according to Bobby Zirkin Injury Lawyer, if someone is going to be working with children in any capacity, then they are absolutely required to get background checks for it, no questions asked. There are no exceptions, but there are a number of things that make this law a lot more accessible to people.
First off, the Child Protective Services Law basically says that criminal background checks and child abuse clearances need to be done before a volunteer can start working. At this point, all current and new volunteers have to have their clearances done and ready to go by August 25th (which is near the beginning of the school year for many Pennsylvania schools).
According to an attorney for slip and fall injuries, there have been provisions made in here to make things easier for volunteers. First off, starting on the 25th of July, those who are looking to volunteer and that need to have those clearances for their volunteer position are going to be able to get both checks for free. This is incredibly good news if you need a Baltimore personal injury lawyer, especially for nonprofit organizations that may have had a bit of difficulty when it came to paying for their volunteers to get their clearances done. Another thing is that the process is all online, and it’s becoming even more automated.
Pennsylvania state law Since the state is doing everything possible to make it easier for volunteers and employees to get what they need in terms of clearances, a lot of people are very happy with the changes and believe that they’re a big step in the right direction when it comes to preventing child abuse and abduction issues, which are a constant issue all over the country.
What do you think about the changes that are being made in Pennsylvania state law? Do you feel like it’s going to make as much of a difference as many are saying it is going to? If you live in Pennsylvania, are you affected by the change, and how do you feel about it?
One of the issues that happens when countries are dealing with debt is that people will try to take advantage of it in any way that they can. They may buy up cheap up things in order to make some money themselves, while that country is still suffering for what is going on behind their gates.
The biggest issue that a number of countries, including Greece, have been seeing is something that is referred to as “vulture funds.” Basically, what happens is that these investors will swoop into a country that is on the brink of default and they will buy bonds so that they can try to profit off of it in their own country. The main issue that comes up is that these people will then claim those investments at their full value, instead of the amount which they spent for the bond in the first place. They end up benefiting immensely, and sometimes, the home country has no idea. This makes those countries lose cash, while also making it so that the country it came from is still struggling as well.
Belgium decided to step in on this with an issue that they were having with Argentinean funds that were being taken advantage of in this way. How did they deal with it? Basically, they made laws that stated that those investments could never, for any reason, be claimed on taxes for their full value at any point in time – you’ll need a family law attorney. So, that means that those vulture bonds are going to be blocked for those immense benefits that they were getting. Of course, this only happens when the bonds have been identified as vulture bonds – which is a process, but a worthwhile one.
Do you think that this was a wise legal move, or do you think that it wasn’t the way that they should have gone when it comes to dealing with these sorts of investors? Leave your thoughts in the comments and let us know how you feel about Belgium’s move toward making things more fair for everyone in the investment market.
California put a law into place recently that has a lot of parents confused and frustrated. In short, the law states that children (all children) must have all of their vaccines done and they must have proof of them before they can enroll in a school. The only exception that is allowed for children is if there is some sort of medical exception (allergic reaction, seizures, etc) that makes it so that they can’t get vaccines.
So, why does this bring up such an issue? First off, there are some parents who believe that vaccines cause a wide array of health issues, including autism. While there is still debate going on about whether or not this is the case (and there isn’t currently a lot of medical research to back those claims up), California decided to take the initiative and declare that you just can’t get a exemption anymore, and that a doctor has to be involved in your decision and approve it according to the state guidelines.
Now, here’s where the law comes into play and how it could affect whether or not children are even allowed to go to school. According to a Philadelphia Attorney; those medical restrictions are incredibly strict, and there are some children who, even though vaccines may make them ill, do not fall into those. So, parents worry that their only solution is to be to go ahead and just homeschool their children so that they don’t have to get them vaccinated or risk the dangers (or what they perceive to be the potential dangers) related to using vaccines.
There is still debate on how this is going to work, and there are a lot of states that have their eyes on California to see how the whole thing is going to go. Is it going to stop epidemics from illnesses that we got rid of long ago because of vaccines? Or is it not going to change much? What do you think about this topic and do you think the California law is legitimate and should be copied by other states in the future?
There are a lot of laws out there related to mobile phone theft and, because of that, a lot of people have been trying to navigate their way through all of what is going on through a criminal defence lawyer. One of the biggest changes that has happened in the industry is that it’s a lot harder for people to get into phones in the first place – with passcodes and device protection methods, it’s becoming more and more useless for people to go and steal mobile devices.
There are statements out that states are looking to develop laws that will make it even more difficult for people to steal phones and actually be able to use them, with the use of device protection methods, says one criminal defence lawyer. These basically don’t even allow you to factory reset the phone without putting a passcode in. That means that people can’t go in and mess up people’s phones without actually knowing the passcode so that they can get into it. And states are now looking at making it required for phone companies to have this as part of their phones, for free.
Apple and Google have had these options before, but they weren’t as extensive as what states are talking about doing with these laws. Each phone company will have their own options that they can utilize in order to achieve this end, and there will probably be a lot of creative things that these companies do to help prevent phone theft in the future. Who knows, with how common technologies related to fingerprints and such have gotten, that may be the way that things end up going in the future when it comes to keeping mobile devices safe.
What do you think? Will these sorts of things make it more difficult for phone thefts to happen? Do you think that the states should step in and make laws where it is required for companies to make this a part of the standard plan or setup for a phone? If you’ve had these services, do you use them and do you feel more secure? Let us know in the comments.